Skepfeeds-The Best Skeptical blogs of the day

The Royal Society is no match for these three

Posted in News by Skepdude on April 12, 2009

Madonna, Stella McCartney and Gwyneth Paltrow

Behold, the most serious challenge to the Royal Society in that august body’s 350-year history – the medical musings of Madonna, Gwyneth Paltrow and Stella McCartney. These women are not just singers, or actresses, or fashion designers. They are distinguished professors at the University of Celebrity, and are coating your understanding of science like a totally amazing organic body oil.

On top of this, they are best friends, so we can say their pronouncements are peer-reviewed in the best sense of that term. Can you imagine their gatherings? It must be as if Isaac Newton were taking antioxidant tea with Robert Koch and Marie Curie.

We shall come to her latest discoveries shortly, but by way of background, do recall that Gwyneth has formerly claimed that eating “biological foods” can prevent cancer, reminding us that starring in Iron Man and maintaining a glittering career in clinical research are not mutually exclusive. Then we have Madonna, who has cited the extraordinary healing powers of Kabbalah water, which costs $4 a bottle, is said to have had energy injected into it, and may or may not have been blessed by the former insurance salesman who dreamed up her religion.

Other fields of specialism? Alas, Lost in Showbiz hasn’t the space today, but Madonna has previously championed a soi-disant scientist who claims to have reversed the second law of thermodynamics. And then there’s Stella, who launched her organic skincare range with the warning that “lots of skin products use the same petrochemicals as the antifreeze in your car!”, and is one of those celebrities who thinks they eat “chemical-free” food and use “chemical-free” products. I beg you not to tell her that water and trees are made of chemicals. The shock could finish her off.


On the veracity of the Bible

Posted in Skepdude by Skepdude on April 12, 2009

I have one question for anyone who believes the Bible to be the true word of God:

-How would you distinguish between the Bible written be the true omnibenevolent, omniscient God and the very same Bible written by a malicious God who’s just playing with us? What criteria would you use to distinguish the one from the other?

Please note that “the Bible tells me so” ain’t good enough because the content of  both books would be the same under my scenario, only the authorship would differ.